what is your opinion on the multiverse theory ?
And do u believe there exists universes in which our laws aren't applicable ?
Answers
Answered by
1
i think it is true..
that's why we r able to experience the Mandela effect sometimes... laws of physics could be applicable in the parallel universe...!!!
that's why we r able to experience the Mandela effect sometimes... laws of physics could be applicable in the parallel universe...!!!
Answered by
1
The Multiverse question assumes an answer, which can only be arrived at via Reductionism. All ‘possible outcomes’ are in terms of alternatives whichmust and are bound to happen anyway. There’s no longer a need for novelty nor uniqueness, because they both wither away in a morass of collapsing circularity and morbid conclusions.
For example:
If we have different universes containing variations of everything found in the others, we are led to a dilemma: if the laws of a universe (or its events and/or entities) are the same in each universe, then they cannot be a different universe; rather, extents of each other. However; if the laws (or events and/or entities) are different in other universes, then they cannot be compared, because the very definition of what a universe is, what those events mean, and what those entities are can no longer adhere to any ubiquitous criteria.
Furthermore, any particular set of criteria chosen is compelled to beprovincial to that universe in which it is established and may not even be applicable to another.
It forms an hypothesis for which no evidence and only speculation provide the need for. It also implicitly requires a knowledge and command of same for all that which is known or yet unknown, does or does not yet exist, and has or has not yet happened which could be considered both necessary and sufficient in fashioning any kind of validity claim.
Therefore the concept of Multiverse cannot be an explanation for anything.
For example:
If we have different universes containing variations of everything found in the others, we are led to a dilemma: if the laws of a universe (or its events and/or entities) are the same in each universe, then they cannot be a different universe; rather, extents of each other. However; if the laws (or events and/or entities) are different in other universes, then they cannot be compared, because the very definition of what a universe is, what those events mean, and what those entities are can no longer adhere to any ubiquitous criteria.
Furthermore, any particular set of criteria chosen is compelled to beprovincial to that universe in which it is established and may not even be applicable to another.
It forms an hypothesis for which no evidence and only speculation provide the need for. It also implicitly requires a knowledge and command of same for all that which is known or yet unknown, does or does not yet exist, and has or has not yet happened which could be considered both necessary and sufficient in fashioning any kind of validity claim.
Therefore the concept of Multiverse cannot be an explanation for anything.
Similar questions