History, asked by stacy49, 9 months ago

What proved so controversial about the Bush administration’s allegations about Iraq’s stockpile of weapons of mass destruction or WMDs?

A) Following an inquiry, UN inspectors discovered that the United States government itself had supplied the WMDs to Iraq.

B)UN inspectors discovered that Iraq's stockpile of WMDs was considerably larger than the Bush administration had projected, leading to accusations of military mismanagement.

C)Following the invasion of Iraq, inspectors from the United Nations never found evidence of WMDs in Iraq.

Answers

Answered by tushargupta0691
1

Answer:

Following the invasion of Iraq, inspectors from the United Nations never found evidence of WMDs in Iraq.

Explanation:

  • Invading Iraq was the president's choice to "undermine Saddam Hussein's capacity to wage war." Saddam Hussein allegedly possessed weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs, according to the Bush administration (which was later found to be false).
  • Saddam Hussein's alleged support for and harbouring of terrorists was the fundamental justification for the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, according to intelligence reports.
  • Many of the Bush Administration's pre-war claims concerning Iraq's WMD were found to be false and unsupported by the underlying evidence, according to the Senate Report of Pre-War Intelligence on Iraq, which was formally published by the US Senate a year later.

Thus the correct option is C.

#SPJ2

Similar questions