What role does separation of power play in making independence of judiciary
successful? PS: THIS IS A 4 MARK QUESTION... PLEASE ANSWER SOON AS POSSIBLE
xXSofiaXx:
hlw
hloww
Answers
Answered by
5
THIS IS YOUR ANSWER ⬇️
___________________
What role does separation of power play in making independence of judiciary successful?
ANSWER ⤵️
The independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers are fundamental principles of constitutional government intended to ensure that the proper functioning of each of the separate branches of state.
___________________
THIS IS YOUR ⬆️
CORRECT ANSWER ☺️
✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅
HEY! THANK YOU SOFIA!!
welcome ☺️
Answered by
3
Parliament and the Judiciary and I intend to keep it within those limits. We must give due credence to this special relationship because one branch makes the laws and the other is responsible for interpreting them and passing judgments. There is therefore critical need for symbiosis and mutual respect between the Parliament and the Judiciary. Ultimately, this makes for a very delicate and volatile relationship.
Constructive relationships between the
two arms of government - the legislature and the judiciary - is essential to the effective maintenance of the constitution and the rule
of law. In recent years, the character of this relationship has changed significantly, both because of changes in governance and because of wider societal change.
The other constitutional principle of central importance in governing the relationship between the Judiciary and Parliament is that
of the ‘independence of the Judiciary’ and the ‘independence of Parliament’. This does not
and should not mean that the Judiciary and Parliament have to be isolated from each other or the other branches of the State. Nor does it mean that both organs - individually and collectively
- need to be insulated from scrutiny, general
accountability for their role or properly made
public criticisms of conduct inside or outside the
courtroom and the plenary. In my long experience
as a Parliamentarian, the accountability of MPs is to those who elected them i.e the citizen.
Pls mark me brainliest ❤️
Constructive relationships between the
two arms of government - the legislature and the judiciary - is essential to the effective maintenance of the constitution and the rule
of law. In recent years, the character of this relationship has changed significantly, both because of changes in governance and because of wider societal change.
The other constitutional principle of central importance in governing the relationship between the Judiciary and Parliament is that
of the ‘independence of the Judiciary’ and the ‘independence of Parliament’. This does not
and should not mean that the Judiciary and Parliament have to be isolated from each other or the other branches of the State. Nor does it mean that both organs - individually and collectively
- need to be insulated from scrutiny, general
accountability for their role or properly made
public criticisms of conduct inside or outside the
courtroom and the plenary. In my long experience
as a Parliamentarian, the accountability of MPs is to those who elected them i.e the citizen.
Pls mark me brainliest ❤️
Similar questions