Question

what should the judiciary do to win the trust of common people in Nepal? write in four points​

Answer 1

Answer:

Public trust remains a key feature for judiciary to function as a credible public institution. In fact, this is considered to be cardinal for the institution to derive and execute its legitimacy.

‐‐ Professional Aspect

Professional attitude remains a cornerstone of any professional body. And this acquires special meaning if it pertains to important public institutions dispensing justice.

In case of Nepal, this element is often invoked as judiciary remains highly centralized and at times exhibits dissociation from the concerns of the public. Further, in societies like Nepal where power remains lopsided, permanent institutions like judiciary wield power which often times is beyond check.

In the last three decades, Nepali judiciary has made many bureaucratic arrangements to ensure dispensation of justice. This has had a mixed result. 

-- Cultural Fanifestation

We use the term cultural meaning both practice as a process and perception of the practice

The historical experiences of many places including Nepal tell us that fault lines of conflict are drawn because of this incompatibility between so-called modern law and the traditional practices.

-- Enhance capacity

The idea of public trust therefore is not a natural process. The arguments in the preceding paragraphs amply demonstrate that they have to be cultivated over a period of time.

Therefore, attention needs to be paid on customizing our institutional capacities to meet the ever growing legal (also read social and cultural) challenges of Nepali society.