Question

What was the effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission?

A.
It removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts.
B.
It removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups.
C.
It prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns.
D.
It prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.

Answer 1

Answer:

• hi pls mark as brainliest

Explanation:

Federal Election Commission that held that corporations could be banned from making electioneering communications. The Court upheld the reporting and disclaimer requirements for independent expenditures and electioneering communications. The Court's ruling did not affect the ban on corporate contributions.

• option d is correct

Answer 2

US election funding case in Supreme Court which removed restrictions.

Option:(b)

Explanation:

• Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission, is a unique US Supreme Court case related to election campaign with funding.
• There exists a clause which restricts non-governmental organisations, corporates and other social associations from funding a political party.
• The issue made headlines during 2008 elections in the US. Hillary Clinton was contesting for the presidential seat.
• The case saw agitation on the ground that it curbs free speech as said by justice.

Supreme Court's ruling in favour of Citizen's United:

https://brainly.in/question/17273513