History, asked by naseermak3277, 11 months ago

What were the consequences of quit india movement?

Answers

Answered by kirtilukkad2003
1

The Quit India movement, which began in the early 1940s, was an intense last-ditch effort to remove the British imperial government. Although the movement was linked to encouragement from Mahatma Gandhi, some historians argue that this violent protest was far from what he approved of during his time of influence. However, others might argue that Gandhi did not discourage the violence that broke out, because he felt it might have been India’s last chance for freedom, especially because of the impending threat of Japanese invasion....

HOPE MY ANSWER HELPED U ✌✌

Answered by vardan1
1

The Quit India movement, which began in the early 1940s, was an intense last-ditch effort to remove the British imperial government. Although the movement was linked to encouragement from Mahatma Gandhi, some historians argue that this violent protest was far from what he approved of during his time of influence. However, others might argue that Gandhi did not discourage the violence that broke out, because he felt it might have been India’s last chance for freedom, especially because of the impending threat of Japanese invasion.

The people of India created chaos by destroying government buildings, civic areas, and transportation centers to get their point across. However, this crusade eventually led the British to remove themselves from the country. The financial toll of World War II and the massive cost of repairs at home may have been a major factor in stopping British rule.

Moreover, after this massive revolt, the country of India may have been viewed as unconquerable, and this also helped the citizens to gain their independence. Yet, Quit India did come at a high cost. The uprising left the country in a ruined state and resulted in a massive loss of life and more financial issues for the country.

Similar questions