Question

what were the differences between the army of the Rajput and the turks​

Answer 1

Answer:

Rajput Shahar only Rajput you can't beat them

Answer 2

Answer:

RAJPUTS:

• The Rajputs frequently engaged in defensive combat with the foreign invaders, which was not the proper strategy for victory.
• The Rajputs made little effort to learn about the most recent methods and tools employed abroad.
• The elephants were extremely important to the Rajput people. The battle cries and the horses' quick movements instantly instilled terror in the elephants. They panicked and created chaos in their own camp as they rushed around erratically.
• Leadership in the military is significantly different from bravery and gallantry. The Rajput kings and their generals lacked the necessary skills to instil zeal in their soldiers.

TURKS:

• With their two units—one being the forward guard and the other being the reserve—the Turks adopted a unique tactic. The purpose of the advance guard was to put them to the test and identify their weak points. After the Rajputs had used up all of their supplies, the reserve was thrust into the combat.

• The Turks' effective cavalry was their greatest asset. The elephants were scared away by the Turkish archers who shot arrows from the backs of their horses.
• Unlike the rajputs, the Turk invaders were able to quickly incite the war cry "to do or die."

The Rajput monarchs' warriors frequently believed they were powerless to confront the enemy once the Raja died or vanished. Even for a little period, the Raja's departure sparked fear in the troops. Anand Pal's temporary disappearance after his elephant was struck by an arrow generated panic in his army, which then lost heart and fought Mahmud of Ghazni.

#SPJ5