Question

what were the effects of the land revenue settlements introduced
of by a British​

Answer 1

The British introduced different land revenue systems in different parts of the country. For instance, Permanent Settlement was introduced in Bengal and Ryotwari system was mainly introduced in South India. The Mahalwari system of land revenue was introduced in the Central provinces, North West Frontier Provinces, Agra, Punjab and the Gangetic valley.

In all these land revenue systems, the revenue was fixed at a very high rate. In Permanent settlement, the Company fixed the revenue so high that it became difficult for zamindars to pay revenues to the Company. The settlement was oppressive for villagers as they had to pay high rent to the zamindars. Their rights on the land were maintained till they paid the revenues. To pay the high land revenues, they had to take loans from moneylenders at high interest rates.Cultivators failed to pay the high rent and thus were evicted from their lands which they had been cultivating since generations. In other land revenue systems too, most of the peasants were not able to pay teh revenues and hence lost their lands.

Answer 2

Answer:

The Consequences of the British land revenue systems:

• Land has become a commodity.
• Earlier there has been no non-public possession of the land. Even kings and cultivators now no longer recollect land as their ‘non-public property.
• Due to the very excessive taxes, farmers resorted to developing coins vegetation in place of meal vegetation. This caused meals lack of confidence or even famines.
• Taxes on agricultural produce have been mild in the course of pre-British times. The British made it very excessive.
• Insistence on coins charge of sales caused greater indebtedness amongst farmers. Moneylenders have become landowners in due course.
• Bonded labor arose due to the fact loans have been given to farmers/laborers who couldn't pay them back.
• When India finished freedom from colonial rule, 7% of the villagers (Zamindars/landowners) owned 75% of the rural land.

#SPJ2