WHAT WERE THE TWO ACTS INTRODUCED BY THE BRITISH TO SUPRESS THE INDIANS?
2. WHY WERE THE INDIANS ENRAGED BY THE ILBERT BILL?
3. WHY WAS THE ROWLATT ACT TERMED AS THE BLACK ACT?
4. WHO HEADED THE KHILAFAT MOVEMENT?
5. WHAT DID THE PEOPLE DO TO SUPPORT THE NON COOPERATION MOVEMENT?
can any one can give me the answer from history ncrt book pls
Answers
Answer:
WHAT WERE THE TWO ACTS INTRODUCED BY THE BRITISH TO SUPRESS THE INDIANS?
1. The Prevention of seditious meetings Act (1907 AD)
It was enacted to make better provision for the prevention of public meetings likely to promote sedition or to cause a disturbance of public tranquillity) was a 1907 act of the Imperial Legislative Council of the British Raj enabling the government to prohibit political meeting.
2. The Explosives Substances Act (1908 AD)
In this Act, the expression “explosive substance” shall be deemed to include any materials for making any explosive substance; also any apparatus, machine, implement or material used, or intended to be used, or adapted for causing, or aiding in causing, any explosion in or with any explosive substance; also any part of any such apparatus, machine or implement.
2. WHY WERE THE INDIANS ENRAGED BY THE ILBERT BILL?
The Ilbert Bill was a bill formally introduced on 9 February 1883 during the Viceroyship of the Marquess of Ripon, which was drafted by Sir Courtenay Peregine Ilbert, the legal member of the Council of the Governor-General of India. It concerned the jurisdiction of Magistrates or Sessions Judges to try charges against "European British subjects" if they were themselves not European.
The Graphic, 25 January 1884, p. 605: "The Native Agitation in India – A Meeting in the Town Hall, Bombay, in Support of Mr. Ilbert's Criminal Jurisdiction Bill".
It is named after Courtenay Ilbert, who had proposed it as a compromise between two previously suggested bills. However, the introduction of the bill led to intense opposition in Britain and from Britons living in India that ultimately played on ethnic tensions before it was enacted in 1884 in a severely compromised state.[1] The bitter controversy deepened antagonism between the British and Indians and was a prelude to the formation of the Indian National Congress in the next two years.
Answer:
1. The British government at the start of the any national movement (Non-cooperation/Civil Disobedience) arrested the prominent Indian leaders and imprisoned them. During the Rawlatt Satyagrah, the Satyagrahis were forced to rub their noses on the ground, crawl on the streets, and had to salute all the British officers.
2. The Ilbert bill was passed in 1883 by Lord Ripon. This bill sought to create political equality by vesting Indian judges with the power to try the Europeans or the British citizens residing in India. This bill was vehemently opposed by the Europeans as they did not wanted to be tried by an Indian judge.
3.Rowlatt Act of 1919 is known as the black act or law as it severely curtailed civil liberties. The law made it possible for the British government to jail anyone suspected of plotting or overthrowing the government in jail even without a trial and to try them without any jury.
4.Shaukat Ali, Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar, Hakim Ajmal Khan, and Abul Kalam Azad
5.Gandhi strengthened the movement by supporting the contemporaneous Khilafat Movement, the Muslim campaign to restore the status of the Khalifa and protest the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire after World War I.