Question

What would a perfect Earth look like?
What is the ideal climate for the Earth?
Do we have a responsibility to restore the Earth to what it was like before humans began to change it?
Many philosophers have distinguished between the natural and the good. When it comes to the Earth, should we make such a distinction?
When, if ever, is it okay for humans to change the weather?
When, if ever, is it okay for humans to change the physical landscape?
If technology is used to preserve something natural, is it still natural?
Do we owe future generations an Earth similar to the one we live in today? Or does every generation need to make the best of the planet it inherits?
Is changing the climate equally bad if it is done by accident or on purpose? Is it necessarily bad in the first place?
If we discover a planet just like the Earth but with no people on it, would it be all right to colonize it?
If we discover a planet that is not Earth-like but we can use technology to terraform it so that we can live there, would it be all right to do so?
Do your answers to the above questions depend on whether these planets have life on them? If so, does it matter whether that life is intelligent?
Suppose we were to discover a vast new empty island on the Earth. Would your answers be the same for the island as they were for another planet?
Would the world be better with more technology or with less?

Answer 1

Answer:

we have to use the technology in a correct way!!

Explanation:

island is totally different from a planet.planet is many times larger than island.i cannot support with increasing of technology.. because technology is increasing day by day..the natural species on earth is vacating..if we discover a new planet like earth before the earth has its end all the people will colonise it .again they make the same situation there..we have the responsibility to restore the earth when it was once it had..the future generations will suffer more what we are suffering now...earth is a spherical shaped like a ball