History, asked by sachdevakavish72, 7 months ago

when did Auranzaib died?​

Answers

Answered by priteesingh34447
1

Answer:

3 March 1707 is correct answer

Answered by mridhu7860
2

Answer:

sure I may answer you

Explanation:

Muhi-ud-Din Muhammad[3] (3 November 1618 – 3 March 1707),[1] commonly known by the sobriquet Aurangzeb (Persian: "Ornament of the Throne")[3] or by his regnal title Alamgir (Persian: "Conqueror of the World"),[4] was the sixth Mughal emperor, who ruled over almost the entire Indian subcontinent for a period of 49 years.[5][6][7] Widely considered to be the last effective ruler of the Mughal Empire,[8] Aurangzeb compiled the Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, and was among the few monarchs to have fully established Sharia law and Islamic economics throughout the Indian subcontinent.[9][10][page needed] He was an accomplished military leader[11] whose rule has been the subject of praise, though he has also been described as the most controversial ruler in Indian history.[12]

Muhi-ud-din Muhammad

Aurangzeb Alamgir

محی‌الدین محمد

اورنگ‌زیب عالمگیر

Sixth Mughal Emperor

Badshah

Aurangzeb

Alamgir I

Aurangzeb-portrait.jpg

Emperor Aurangzeb seated on a throne in the darbar with a hawk

6th Mughal Emperor

Reign

31 July 1658 – 3 March 1707

Coronation

13 June 1659 at Shalimar Bagh, Delhi

Predecessor

Shah Jahan

Successor

Muhammad Azam Shah (titular)

Bahadur Shah I

Born

Muḥī al-Dīn Muḥammad[1]

4 November 1618 (N.S.)

Dahod, Mughal Empire (present-day Gujarat, India)

Died

3 March 1707 (N.S.) (aged 88)

Ahmednagar, Mughal Empire (present-day Maharashtra, India)

Burial

Tomb of Aurangzeb, Khuldabad, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

Consort

Dilras Banu Begum[2]

Wives

Nawab Bai[2]

Aurangabadi Mahal[2]

Udaipuri Mahal[2]

Issue

Zeb-un-Nissa

Muhammad Sultan

Zinat-un-Nissa

Bahadur Shah I

Badr-un-Nissa

Zubdat-un-Nissa

Muhammad Azam Shah

Sultan Muhammad Akbar

Mehr-un-Nissa

Muhammad Kam Bakhsh

Full name

Muhi-ud-Din Muhammad[1]

Regnal name

Alamgir[1]

House

Timurid

Father

Shah Jahan

Mother

Mumtaz Mahal

Religion

Sunni Islam

Aurangzeb Bahadur holding an iris

He was a notable expansionist; during his reign, the Mughal Empire reached its greatest extent, ruling over nearly all of the Indian subcontinent.[13] During his lifetime, victories in the south expanded the Mughal Empire to 4 million square kilometres,[14] and he ruled over a population estimated to be over 158 million subjects,[13] with an annual revenue of $450 million (more than ten times that of his contemporary Louis XIV of France),[15] or £38,624,680 (2,879,469,894 rupees) in 1690. Under his reign, India surpassed Qing China to become the world's largest economy and biggest manufacturing power, worth nearly a quarter of global GDP and more than the entirety of Western Europe, and its largest and wealthiest subdivision, the Bengal Subah,[16] signaled the proto-industrialization.[17][18][19][page needed]

Aurangzeb was noted for his religious piety; he memorized the entire Quran, studied hadiths and stringently observed the rituals of Islam.[20][21] Unlike his predecessors, including his father Shah Jahan, Aurangzeb considered the royal treasury to be held in trust for the citizens of his empire.[21][page needed][22][page needed] He did not enjoy a luxurious life and his personal expenses and constructions of small mosques were covered by his own earnings, which included the sewing of caps and trade of his written copies of the Quran.[23][24] He also patronized works of Islamic and Arabic calligraphy.[25]

Aurangzeb has been subject to criticism. Critics argue that his policies abandoned his predecessors' legacy of pluralism and religious tolerance, citing his introduction of the jizya tax and other policies based on Islamic ethics, demolition of Hindu temples, the executions of his elder brother Dara Shikoh, Maratha king Sambhaji[26][27] and the ninth Sikh guru Tegh Bahadur,[28][29][a] and the prohibition and supervision of behaviour and activities that are forbidden in Islam such as music, gambling, fornication, and consumption of alcohol and narcotic.[30][31] Various historians question the historicity of the claims of his critics, arguing that his destruction of temples has been exaggerated,[32][33] and noting that he also built temples,[34] paid for their maintenance,[35][page needed] employed significantly more Hindus in his imperial bureaucracy than his predecessors did, and opposed bigotry against Hindus and Shia Muslims.[36]

Similar questions