Question

'...when he himself agreed upon anything, the thing was done.' In what way does this sentence throw light on the semi-barbarism of kings in ancient times? When would a king be labeled as barbaric? (Chapter- The Lady Or, The Tiger?) please answer the question it's urgent ​

Answer 1

Answer:

He is simply being facetious when he says of the king, "He was greatly given to self-communing, and, when he and himself agreed upon anything, the thing was done," it is a whimsical way of saying that the king was an autocrat and never had a need to consult anyone else about his edicts

Explanation:

Mark me brainlest