English, asked by fernandostevan, 6 months ago

which among the accounts or analyses do you consider the most convincing and reliable?Why?research more about these sources

Answers

Answered by soubhikmondal65
23

Explanation:

Government Entities. These websites tend to be reliable since they are highly regulated. ...

Research Think Tanks. ...

Academic Libraries and Databases. ...

Professional Standards Organizations.

Answered by Jasleen0599
0

The accounts or analyses do you consider the most convincing and reliable.

  • To develop a thoughtful response, learn more about these sources. I believe Rafael Palma's interpretation to be the most persuasive of the narratives. Jose Rizal did not, in my opinion, retract due to his narrative.
  • Rizal signed a paper a few hours before he was killed, referring to it as "The Retraction," in which he claimed to be a Catholic and renounced all of his works critical of the church. In addition, Father Manuel Garcia, C. discovered Rizal's retracting letter in the Manila archive of the Catholic hierarchy in 1935.
  • The contested account of Rizal's Retraction was attributed to Vicente Balaguer. Padre Pio Pi Rafael Palma is a politician, attorney, and educator who is a superior Jesuit. Under the pen name Roman Ozaeta, he translated Austin Coates, the assistant colonial secretary, and Palma's writings.
  • Rizal's retracting was due to four well-known factors. Prior to anything else, he desired to legally wed Josephine Bracken and claim her as his wife. Second, he wished to shield his loved ones. Thirdly, he wished to see reforms in the Spanish government.

#SPJ2

Similar questions