Which approach should a group use to resist change if the group has power over implementation and if the group will lose out in the change? Negotiation top management support participation coercion education?
Answers
Answered by
0
No party system is ideal for all countries and all situations because the party system is not what a country actually chooses. It evolves over a long time, depending on the nature of society, its social and regional divisions, its history of politics and its system of elections. These cannot be changed quickly. Each country develops a party system which is conditioned by its special circumstances. For example, if India has evolved a multi-party system, it is because the social and geographical diversity in such a large country is not easily absorbed by two or even three parties.
Answered by
0
(a) Negotiation
Explanation:
- Negotiation is formal means of accomplishing cooperation. Negotiation use formal bargaining to win "acceptance & approval" of a preferred change
- For instance, if the marketing division has the fear of losing in case a new management structure has been implemented, then the top management can negotiate with the marketing division in order to reach at a decision
- Companies which "strong unions' frequently should formally negotiate change with unions. The change can become a part of the union contract" which reflects the agreement of "both parties"
To know more
Importance of creativity and innovation for an organisation - Brainly.in
https://brainly.in/question/10447349
Similar questions