Which best describes the way historians consider letters and journals?
A. primary source documents that are useful in the study of history
B. reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source
C. secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history
D. unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective
alicuhh2002:
lol
Answers
Answered by
5
The correct answer is option A.
Historians consider letters and journals as primary source documents that are useful in the study of history.
Letters and journals are also considered as important documents because they are unaltered pieces of history.
A lot of useful information can be taken out by reading these letters and journals.
Answered by
2
Primary source documents that are useful in the study of history.
Similar questions
Chemistry,
7 months ago
Social Sciences,
7 months ago
Math,
7 months ago
Science,
1 year ago
Biology,
1 year ago