History, asked by alicuhh2002, 1 year ago

Which best describes the way historians consider letters and journals?

A. primary source documents that are useful in the study of history

B. reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source

C. secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history

D. unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective


alicuhh2002: lol
alicuhh2002: nahh
alicuhh2002: i dont know you

Answers

Answered by Answers4u
5

The correct answer is option A.

Historians consider letters and journals as primary source documents that are useful in the study of history.

Letters and journals are also considered as important documents because they are unaltered pieces of history.

A lot of useful information can be taken out by reading these letters and journals.

Answered by chitchitlay547
2

Primary source documents that are useful in the study of history.

Similar questions