Which best describes the way photographs are considered by historians?
Answers
Answered by
0
❤ hEllo mAte ❤
==> The photographs that were taken are considered as secondary source off documents that are useful in the study of history . They can be reliable or unreliable depending upon the source who took them as they can be very subjective at times and could paint a right or wrong picture and could give a visaed perspective .
Hope it helps you ✔️
Mark as Brainliest ✔️
Follow me ✔️
Follow Prabha6449 ✔️
Follow GMTaylor1 ✔️
Answered by
0
The photographs that were taken are considered as secondary source off documents that are useful in the study of history.
primary source documents that are useful in the study of history.
They can be reliable or unreliable depending upon the source who took them as they can be very subjective at times and could paint a right or wrong picture and could give a visaed perspective.
Similar questions