Which best describes the way photographs are considered by historians? A. primary source documents that are useful in the study of history B. reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source C. secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history D. unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective E. useful sources for the study of personal histories, but not for general history
Answers
Answered by
41
A. primary source documents that are useful in the study of history.
hope its help u if so plz mark as brainliest
hope its help u if so plz mark as brainliest
Answered by
2
The photographs that were taken are considered as secondary source off documents that are useful in the study of history.
They can be reliable or unreliable depending upon the source who took them as they can be very subjective at times and could paint a right or wrong picture and could give a visaed perspective.
Similar questions