Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional? The Supreme Court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. Since the 14th Amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the US, the Supreme Court’s decision could not be applied. The Supreme Court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. Since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th Amendment.
Answers
Since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th Amendment explains the best why the Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy V, Ferguson was unconstitutional.
To get the constitutional decision segregation laws should have given equal rights to the no-whites and the ruling party should be consistent with the 14th Amendment.
The landmark decision by the US Supreme Court on the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896 was utterly unconstitutional because it led to racial segregation. It preached a doctrine of “separate but equal”.
It declared separate but equal status on intrastate transportations since the 14th constitutional amendment jurisdiction was limited to only civil and political rights and did not address the social rights. So this decision was unconstitutional because the segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th Amendment.