which is better, a low reuse factor or a high reuse factor? justify your answer?
Answers
Answered by
5
Answer:
The lowest reuse factor (K = 1) maximizes capacity; but this has to be balanced with interference considerations: indeed a higher reuse factor (K = 3, 4, 7, or higher) provides more distance between cells using the same frequency, which lowers interferences.
please please mark me as brainliest please
Answered by
1
Better, a low reuse factor or a high reuse factor
- The frequency reuse factor measures how frequently a given frequency can be utilised throughout the network. It is 1/K (or K, per certain books), where K is the number of cells that cannot transmit at the same frequency.
- The highest reuse factor (K = 3, 4, 7, or greater) gives more distance between cells using the same frequency, which minimises interferences. The lowest reuse factor (K = 1) optimises capacity, however this must be balanced with interference considerations.
- The reduction in base stations is not a benefit of frequency reuse. The benefit of frequency reuse: Reusing frequencies and channels inside a cellular system is a technique for boosting capacity and transmission range.
- Technique for boosting the total capacity of a radio system without expanding its authorised bandwidth by employing a specific frequency range several times in the same radio system.
#SPJ2
Similar questions