which is the system of moral. principle that differentiates between good and bad practice
Answers
Answer:
Morals are accepted behaviors that govern how an individual lives. The development of morals is primarily based on the concept of doing no harm to oneself or others. ... Morals exceed the purpose of principles as they are personal behavioral restrictions that are applied regardless of time or location.
Explanation:
We'll never truly be able to distinguish between "right" and "wrong" actions. At best, we can only say that morality is normative, while acknowledging that our sense of right and wrong will change over time.
At any given time in history, however, philosophers, theologians, and politicians will claim to have discovered the best way to evaluate human actions and establish the most righteous code of conduct. But it's never that easy. Life is far too messy and complicated for there to be anything like a universal morality or an absolutist ethics. The Golden Rule is great (the idea that you should treat others as you would like them to treat you), but it disregards moral autonomy and leaves no room for the imposition of justice (such as jailing criminals), and can even be used to justify oppression (Immanuel Kant was among its most staunchest critics). Moreover, it's a highly simplified rule of thumb that doesn't provision for more complex scenarios. For example, should the few be spared to save the many? Who has more moral worth: a human baby or a full-grown great ape? And as neuroscientists have shown, morality is not only a culturally-ingrained thing, it's also a part of our psychologies .
What should the goal be? Maximising happiness, minimizing pain, etc.? "Maximising morality" or "minimizing immorality" are bad ideas here, because then you have to define morality/immorality- which is what the goal is supposed to be to begin with