Computer Science, asked by ameerakhan4608, 9 months ago

Which media is used by secret agencies headquarters?
And why that media is important?

Answers

Answered by ItzXmartySHRUTI
1

Explanation:

(1) RAW has a budget much higher than that of ISI. A key factor.

(2) RAW has 15 satellites in orbit for effective surveillance, telephonic interception etc. ISI has zero.

Answered by thankyebo12
0

Answer:

Explanation:

Social media includes a number of services and platforms that we have all

become very familiar with: social networking (Facebook), micro-blogging, wikis,

and media sharing (YouTube). Social media services are usually maintained as

third-party platforms, and allow users to create profiles and content, share their

own and other content, and connect and dialogue with others, among other

things. Individuals as well as organizations can become part of these online

communities and forums. The use of social media is considered the fifth wave of

government information and communication technology, preceded by

mainframes, central timeshare systems, personal computers and online services.

8

It is a core facet of Web 2.0, which is characterized by user-generated content and

online identities and communities. More simple forms of social media were

certainly used by people and government prior to the Web 2.0 era, including

things like bulletin boards.

9

As noted above, the administration of Barack Obama issued its Open

Government Initiative and Directive and the Web 2.0 phenomenon has been

firmly established in federal government agencies. There is certainly a norm and

expectation that organizations use social media to extend their presence and

provide easier access to government information. After all, social media allows

government to meet people “where they are,” with the frequently posited benefits

of public education, engagement and participation, service provision,

collaborative efforts and co-production, openness, transparency and

accountability, trust building, and communication efficiency.

There are an equal number of potential concerns regarding the real efficacy of

government use of social media. Still in the early going, the benefits of social

media in government remain an open question for a variety of reasons. First,

political risks accompany the use of social media. Mistakes and missteps can

result in backfires and unintended consequences, possibly upsetting constituents

and dampening agency use. Thus, the vetting of information and interaction on

social media can hinder the twenty-four-hour, real-time nature of social media

interaction. There is also the possibility that agencies use social media in a

protective fashion in order to maintain or serve their own reputations.

8 Stuart I. Bretschneider and Ines Mergel, “Technology and Public Management Information

Systems: Where We Have Been and Where Are We Going,” in Donald C. Menzel and Harvey L.

White (eds.), The State of Public Administration: Issues, Problems and Challenges (New York:

M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2011), 187-203.

9 John Carlo Bertot, Paul T. Jaeger, and Derek Hansen, “The Impact of Policies on Government

Social Media Usage: Issues, Challenges, and Recommendations,” Government Information

Quarterly 29 (2012): 30-40.

Landon-Murray: Social Media and U.S. Intelligence Agencies

Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2015

70

When using sites like Facebook and Twitter, governments cede control to the

third-party vendors who maintain social media sites, making it more difficult to

ensure that content is properly maintained and protected. Another issue is the

“digital divide,” the problem that certain demographics and individuals may not

have equal access to online forums. Another critique or concern is that national

security organizations cannot make use of social media given the nature of their

work. However, such organizations are in fact using social media, and it remains

an empirical question as to what can and is being accomplished.

Experimentation and “constructive chaos” have described much of the unfolding

use of social media by the U.S. federal government.

10 Federal agencies have tested

and tinkered with various tools and approaches (ironically settling on the more

basic uses), relying on observation of citizen use and preferences, the practices of

other agencies, peer interaction, and formal guidelines.

The result is the use of

social media as a “pure broadcasting mechanism,”

simply “pushing” existing

information through new channels. These dynamics have also been observed

abroad and down to the local level,13 with trial and error approaches resulting in

pre-Web 2.0 tactics.14

To be sure, there have been positive and effective uses of social media, including

in the realm of security and foreign policy. Social media has proven effective in

emergency management and security threat scenarios, in some cases with the

crucial aid of respected journalists.

The U.S. Department of State has adopted

the practice of receiving and responding to citizen and journalist questions on

matters of foreign policy and diplomacy

Conversely, the Transportation

Security Administration has edited the public comments posted on their social

media sites,

a practice that has been exhibited elsewhere as well and can serve

to dampen user interest.

HOPE THIS HELP

Similar questions