Which of the following best explains the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore?
It decided that Florida’s first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and Bush was the winner.
It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.
It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the Constitution.
It decided that Florida’s first recount was against the Constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer: B
Explanation:
trust
Similar questions