Which of the following best states an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
Answers
The second amendment of the US constitution states that there should be no limits on the ownership and usage of guns. Unlike other amendments, the second amendment was totally focussed on issuance of private guns to US citizens for their personal safety from criminals and wild animals. It was considered controversial because everybody could not use guns in the proper way.
Here I have proposed the completion of your question.
Which of the following best states an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
a.No one should be able to own or use a gun.
b.Only local governments can pass gun laws.
c.Guns should only be used for hunting.
d.There should be no limits on owning and using guns.
The correct answer for your question is option (D)-There should be no limits on owning and using guns.
The Second Amendment of the United states constitution deals with the right of its people to own arms. For the sake of good security from wild animals and criminals the second amendment of the U.S constitution had permitted the citizens of United States to keep and bear Arms. The main intention of the second amendment is a well regulated militia is necessary for a free state.