Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources
Answers
Answered by
2
A. They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate.
B. They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions
C. They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
D. They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
B. They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions
C. They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
D. They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
Similar questions
Math,
7 months ago
English,
7 months ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago
Science,
1 year ago