History, asked by thomaskiran6028, 11 months ago

Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources

Answers

Answered by myprofile88
2
A. They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate. 
B. They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions 
C. They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries. 
D. They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
Similar questions