Question

Which of the following describes how to achieve the desired state of the system? Imperative Declarative Iterative Intelligent....???

Answer 1

$\huge \mathfrak \red{hloo \: mate}$

____________★__________________

As a group of concepts, DevOps has converged on several prominent themes including continuous software delivery, automation, and configuration management (CM). These integral pieces often form the pillars of an organization’s DevOps efforts, even as other bigger pieces like overarching best practices and guidelines are still being tried and tested. Being that DevOps is a relatively new paradigm - movement - methodology - [insert your own label here], standards around it have yet to be codified and set in stone. Organizations are left to identify tools and approaches most suitable for their use cases, and will either swear by or disparage them depending on their level of success.

In terms of CM, it’s a given that one particular methodology may work for a company but not for another. However, seldom do differing approaches generate as much dissent as the declarative and imperative models for CM. The recurring debate over which is superior has garnered staunch supporters on both sides and warrants a closer inspection.

Defining Declarative and Imperative Models

Differences between the declarative and imperative models can be summed up in one sentence: imperative focuses on how and declarative focuses on what. In a software engineering context, declarative programming means writing code to describe what the program should do as opposed to how it should do it. One describes what needs to happen; the minutiae for making it so are left to the system. In contrast, imperative programming involves writing code that follows explicit steps to solving a problem, completing a task, or achieving a desired result. It’s telling the system specifically how to do something with the expectation that the desired outcome will result.

____________★__________________

Answer 2

The overall length of ur question looks very long but its quite simple...

They all are very good questions.!!

The answers are:

Principle of "Initiative"

Princeple of "Unity of Command" is violated (u must've read its adv. effects of violation, so i'll not come to that)

Principle of "Remuneration of Employees" and Principle of "Equity" both are applicable.

Principle of "Unity of Direction"

Principle of "Order"

"Differential Piece Wage System"

Principle of "Authority and Responsibility"

Principle of "Division of Work"

Principle of "Authority and Responsibility"

Write the explanation and with an e.g. and also explain adverse effects of violation of the Principle of "Order"

i. Functional Foremnship

ii. Taylor's Scientific principle of Harmony, not Discord

iii. Standardisation Simplification of Work

12. No, they aren't universally applicable

13. Functional Foremanship violates the Fayol's principle of "Unity of Command" In Func. foremanship a worker receives order from eight specialists foremen but Fayol insists that an employee shud receibe order from one and only one boss or superior.

14. The Technique of Functional Foremanship is an extension of Fayol's Principle of "Division of Work"

15. New management techniques like Operations Research, Cost Accounting, Just in Time etc. have been developed on the basis of Principles of Management.