Which of the following is NOT a factor that should be considered in choosing to use the mechanism of whistleblowing in order to deal with a breach in ethical conduct?
1)Is the matter serious, immanent and specific and is there evidence of its seriousness?
2)Would the revelation of the information be of public benefit and do the public have a right to know?
3)Are there less damaging ways of rectifying the problem, such as internal procedures?
4)Will I benefit personally by blowing the whistle?
5)Is blowing the whistle likely to remedy the problem?
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
thank me I thank you ok mate
Answered by
0
Answer:
thank me I will thank you ok mate
Similar questions