Question

which of the following is not the effect of the revolt of 1857 1) Act was passed by the government after the revolt. 2). Title of governer general was not changed. 3) Doctrine of lapse. 4) Responsibility of administration was now in the hands of queen of Britain​

Answer 1

Answer:

up image is the pic for 4 question . Hope it helps you plz follow me

Explanation:

1 - The Government of India Act of 1858 was passed immediately after the Revolt of 1857.

2 - Upon independence in August 1947, the title of viceroy was abolished. The representative of the British Sovereign became known once again as the governor-general.

3 - The doctrine of lapse was an annexation policy applied by the British East India Company in India until 1859. ... The latter supplanted the long-established right of an Indian sovereign without an heir to choose a successor. In addition, the British decided whether potential rulers were competent enough.

4 - The Government of India Act 1858 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (21 & 22 Vict. c. 106) passed on 2 August 1858. Its provisions called for the liquidation of the British East India Company (who had up to this point been ruling British India under the auspices of Parliament) and the transference of its functions to the British Crown.[2] Lord Palmerston, then-Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, introduced a bill for the transfer of control of the Government of India from the East India Company to the Crown, referring to the grave defects in the existing system of the government of India. However, before this bill was to be passed, Palmerston was forced to resign on another issue. Later Edward Henry Stanley, 15th Earl of Derby (who would later become the first Secretary of State for India), introduced another bill which was originally titled as "An Act for the Better Governance of India" and it was passed on 2 August 1858. This act provided that India was to be governed directly and in the name of the Crown.