Question

Which of the following land sites are more suitable for CO2 capture and sequestration

A land site which is prone to earthquakes

A land site which has many layers of impermeable rocks and sediments

A land site which has many layers of sediments

A volcanic land sites​

Answer 1

Answer:

1st option is the right

Explanation:

please mark my answer as brainliest

Answer 2

Answer:

option 1 is correct.

A land site which is prone to earthquakes

Explanation:

As per the question,

Given That:

land sites are more suitable for CO2 capture and sequestration

To Find:

Which of the following land sites are more suitable for CO2 capture and sequestration

Solution:

option 1 is correct.

A land site which is prone to earthquakes.

Explanation:

Geologic formations suitable for sequestration include depleted oil and gas fields, deep coal seams, and saline formations. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that anywhere from 1,800 to 20,000 billion metric tons of CO2 could be stored underground in the United States

You must be aware of the numerous media discussions about commercial direct air capture and long-term geological burial of CO2 removed from the atmosphere of the Earth. As there is no CO2 removed when we reduce our CO2 output, it is judged required. There are numerous issues with those initiatives, not the least of which is that they collectively are unable to remove enough CO2 to have any impact on the climate.

For more such type of question:

https://brainly.in/question/17323573

#SPJ2