History, asked by devion839, 1 year ago

Which of the following statements best compares an armistice to a peace treaty? An armistice happens at the start of a war, while a peace treaty happens at the end of a war. An armistice is a cease-fire agreement that usually happens after a peace treaty has been signed. An armistice sets the terms for fighting in a war, while a peace treaty sets the terms for peace. An armistice is a cease-fire agreement, while a peace treaty is a negotiation for peace.

Answers

Answered by kaalipavan
3

Answer:

Explanation:

An armistice is a cease-fire agreement, while a peace treaty is a negotiation for peace.

Answered by gratefuljarette
1

An armistice is a cease-fire agreement, while a peace treaty is a negotiation for peace.

Explanation:

  • A suspension of threats is more extensive and more formal than a détente, yet isn't exactly a truce understanding. A truce is a conventional consent to stop every single military activity in a contention forever. It parts of the bargains, it doesn't build up harmony; for that, a harmony arrangement must be arranged and endorsed
  • The distinction ought to be very clear at this point. A harmony bargain is a conventional course of action to end war forever. Peace negotiation is only a transitory end of equipped clash. Typically, a cease-fire is the initial step taken towards a harmony settlement.
Similar questions