Question

Which of the following statements does NOT describe the importance of the Alaskan Purchase?

A.The land lacks valuable raw materials.
B.The discovery of gold brought many settlers to the region.
C.It is a land with rich oil deposits.

Answer 1

b is right answer because a and c are described AIASKAN PURCHASE.

Answer 2

The correct option is,(b) The discovery of gold brought many settlers to the region.

• Because a and c are described AIASKAN PURCHASE.

Was Alaska a good purchase?

• Though mocked by some at the time, the 1867 purchase of Alaska came to be regarded as a masterful deal.
• The treaty enlarged the United States by 586,000 square miles, an area more than twice the size of Texas, all for the bargain price of around two cents an acre.

Why did Alaska end up being a good purchase?

• The United States acquired an area over twice as large as Texas, but it was not until the great Klondike gold strike in 1896 that Alaska generally came to be seen as a valuable addition to American territory.
• The seal fishery was one of the chief considerations that induced the United States to purchase Alaska.

Why was the purchase of Alaska significant quizlet?

• (1867) purchase of Alaska from Russia for $7.2 million, instigated by William Steward.
• Was significant because it ridded the continent of another foreign power.

Hence, The discovery of gold brought many settlers to the region does not describe the importance of the Alaskan Purchas.

Learn more about Alaskan Purchase here,

https://brainly.in/question/47822082?msp_poc_exp=5

#SPJ2