Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser
possibility of famine in a democratic country?
Opposition parties can draw attention to hunger and starvation.
Free press can report suffering from famine in different parts of
the country.
Government fears its defeat in the next elections.
People are free to believe in and practice any religion
nont has made
Answers
Answered by
5
People are free to believe in and practice any religion
nont has made is the answer.
Mark as BRAINLIEST.
Answered by
98
"People are free to believe in and practise any religion " is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country.
Similar questions