Social Sciences, asked by tafaulelkhair123, 1 month ago

Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country? a) Opposition parties can draw attention to hunger and starvation. b) Free press can report suffering from famine in different parts of the country. c) Government fears its defeat in the next elections.

Answers

Answered by richitavermadpsv
6

Answer:

Option 'd' is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.

Explanation:

hope it's helpful to you!

Answered by 1157684
1

Answer:

not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.

Similar questions