Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser
possibility of famine in a democratic country?
a Opposition parties can draw attention to hunger and starvation.
b Free press can report suffering from famine in different parts of
the country.
c Government fears its defeat in the next elections.
d People are free to believe in and practise any religion.
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
Option d is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.
Similar questions
Social Sciences,
1 month ago
Art,
2 months ago
Social Sciences,
9 months ago
English,
9 months ago
Economy,
9 months ago