Social Sciences, asked by yeshuk95, 5 months ago

Which one of the following is NOT a reason of de-urnanisation?



Drop in the demand for specialised goods that existing manufacturing towns produced.

Local rulers of old regional centres of power were defeated by the British and new centres of administration were established.

Britishers continued to promote the existing centres of trade and power.

Old trading centres and ports could not survive when the flow of trade moved to new centres.

Choose any one​

Answers

Answered by sashragavi
2

Answer:

Explanation:

For administrative purposes, the British divided colonial India into three Presidencies, which in turn led to the rise in the importance of the Presidency cities of Bombay, Madras and Calcutta. These cities became the centres of  British power in power in the different regions of India. New factories came up, trade developed.

At the same time that these cities were expanding, the towns and cities that manufactured specialised goods declined due to a drop in the demand for what they produced. Old trading centres and ports could not survive when the flow of trade moved to new centres. Similarly, earlier centres of regional power collapsed when local rulers were defeated by the British and new centres of administration emerged. This process is described as de-urbanisation.

please mark as brainiest !!!

please follow me !!!

please thank my answer !!!

please give 5.0/5 rating !!!

Answered by harshpatelap122003
0

Answer:

Local rulers of old regional centres of power were defeated by the British and new centres of administration were established.

Similar questions