Which one of the following statements is not true with respect to the Permanent Settlement system?
The Amount to be paid as revenue was fixed.
The Rajas and Taluqdars were recognised as Zamindars.
This system was introduced in the Southern part of India.
This ensured a regular flow of revenue into the company's coffers.
Answers
Answer:
3rd option
Explanation:
permanant settlement was not introduced in south India it is introduced in north India
Answer:
option no. 3.....YOU CAN READ THE WHOLE EXPLANATION....PLZ.....
Explanation:
The Permanent Settlement, also known as the Permanent Settlement of Bengal, was an agreement between the East India Company and Bengali landlords to fix revenues to be raised from land that had far-reaching consequences for both agricultural methods and productivity in the entire British Empire and the political realities of the Indian countryside. It was concluded in 1793 by the Company administration headed by Charles, Earl Cornwallis.[1] It formed one part of a larger body of legislation, known as the Cornwallis Code. The Cornwallis Code of 1793 divided the East India Company's service personnel into three branches: revenue, judicial, and commercial. Revenues were collected by zamindars, native Indians who were treated as landowners. This division created an Indian landed class that supported British authority.
HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU DEAR FRIEND.......
PLZ FOLLOW ME.......
AND PLZ MARK MY ANSWER IF YOU WISH......