History, asked by micahnevans, 4 months ago

Which statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?

Criminal suspects have the right to not give evidence against themselves.
Criminal suspects have the right to a free lawyer provided by the court.
Criminal suspects have the same right to due process even if underage.
Criminal suspects have the right to not have a jury decide the case.

Answers

Answered by bhaktihbalwadkar
0

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prevents prosecutors from using a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police.

Similar questions