Which statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?
Criminal suspects have the right to not give evidence against themselves.
Criminal suspects have the right to a free lawyer provided by the court.
Criminal suspects have the same right to due process even if underage.
Criminal suspects have the right to not have a jury decide the case.
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prevents prosecutors from using a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police.
Similar questions