While all democratic country are likely to have a constitution,it is not necessary that all countries that have constitution are democratic . Explain it with the help od example?
Answers
Answered by
2
It seems to me that all democratic countries, e.g. republics and representative monarchies, also have a constitution of sorts.
On the other hand, what defines a democratic country is the "power to the people" ergo the ability to decide, directly or indirectly, what laws are passed.
So, it's not so obvious to me that a constitution, in other words a primary set of rules, is necessary. Countries could do with tradition or simply with a set of laws, none of which are more fundamental than others.
Is this correct? If yes, are there examples of democratic countries with no constitution or equivalent?
On the other hand, what defines a democratic country is the "power to the people" ergo the ability to decide, directly or indirectly, what laws are passed.
So, it's not so obvious to me that a constitution, in other words a primary set of rules, is necessary. Countries could do with tradition or simply with a set of laws, none of which are more fundamental than others.
Is this correct? If yes, are there examples of democratic countries with no constitution or equivalent?
Similar questions