Biology, asked by nadspc, 9 months ago

While visit to a garden john observed a flower that did not have anthers. what do you think can his observation be correct? justify your answer

Answers

Answered by brainlyaryan12
4

Answer:

Yes he could have seen a flower with no anthers because some flowers are unisexual

Answered by mariospartan
5

Explanation:

  • Yes, the observation may be true.
  • Flowers can be classified into two types under the presence of the sex whorls i.e. Androecium and gynoecium.
  • The flowers that have both the sex whorls i.e. Androecium and gynoecium are called bisexual flowers. These flowers are generally capable of self-fertilization.
  • The flowers that have one of the sexes i.e. Androecium or gynoecium are called unisexual flowers. These flowers strictly need the help of other flowers for being fertilized.
  • The flower observed by John was a type of unisexual flower that was a female flower, lacking androecium. So,he didn’t see any anther.
Similar questions