who act as a watchdog on the ruling party to ensure the county's growths
Answers
Explanation:
Watchdog journalism is a form of investigative journalism where the author or the publisher fact-checks and interviews political figures and authorities, thereby verifying the validity of their actions and statements. Watchdog journalism usually takes on a form of beat reporting about specific aspects and issuses.
Role Edit
Working as guardians and protectors is what watchdog journalists have to do. In this regard, journalists have to gather information about wrongdoings of people in power and deliver it to the public[1][2] so the public can understand what happens in society and stop wrongdoings. To do their job, maintaining a certain distance from people in power is necessary. This is because they have to challenge the actions of people in power.[1][3] It is totally different from propagandist journalists who serve the interests of people in authority and elite standing.[4] Due to watchdog journalism's unique features, it also often works as the fourth estate.[1][3] The general issues, topics, or scandals that watchdog journalists cover are political corruption and any wrongdoings of people in power such as government officials or corporation executives.[1] One of the important things that watchdog journalists have to do is uncover hidden evidence about wrongdoings.[1]
Three dimension of operationalization Edit
The press working as a watchdog has been one of the fundamental components of a democratic society. According to what Ettema and Glasser (1998) argue, the watchdog of the press is the “stories implicitly demand the response of public officials.”[5] Playing a role as a Fourth Estate, the journalism is able to allow and force people with power, governments in other words, to meet their obligations to the public by publicizing several issues such as a scandal, corruption, and failure to address needs of the public.[6] Mellado (2015) identified and developed three dimensions of operationalization of watchdog role: the intensity of scrutiny, journalistic voice, and the source of news event.[7]
Intensity of scrutiny: Watchdog journalism has a few levels of scrutiny in terms of its reporting style. First of all, at the lowest level, questions and interrogations are a key way to investigate people with power.[8] At a next level, denunciation is still not necessarily needed. But it is consisted of more obvious and somewhat aggressive questions and interrogations.[9] Lastly, the highest level of scrutiny involves the strategy which is designed for people who are investigated to confess their wrongdoing. So at this level, a variety of evidence of wrongdoing is ready to be used. [10]
Journalistic voice: Watchdog journalism needs a few types of voices which are required to address the scrutiny. Specifically, journalists' own voice or a third party's voice is the most general type.[10] In the case of a detached orientation of watchdog journalism, it is likely to use a third party's voice to question, criticize, and denounce wrongdoings what people with power do rather than using journalists' voices.[10]
Source of news event: There is a specific type of event that watchdog journalism is interested in to question, criticize, and denounce. Specifically, not only corruptions of the relationship between people with power and media, but also issues about judiciary processes or external investigations are likely to be handled by a detached orientation of watchdog journalism.
Answer:
Hey dude here is your answer............
Explanation:
Media acts as a crucial watchdog to democratic elections, ... access to opposition parties, help ensure appropriate media behavior during elections. A free and fair election is not only about the freedom to vote and the knowledge of how to cast a vote, but also about a participatory process where voters engage in public debate and have adequate information about parties, policies, candidates and the election process itself in order to make informed choices. Furthermore, media acts as a crucial watchdog to democratic elections, safeguarding the transparency of the process. Indeed, a democratic election with no media freedom, or stifled media freedom, would be a contradiction.
In order to fulfill their roles, the media need to maintain a high level of professionalism, accuracy and impartiality in their coverage. Regulatory frameworks can help ensure high standards. Laws and regulation should guarantee fundamental freedoms essential to democracy, including freedom of information and expression, as well as participation. Meanwhile, provisions such as requiring government media, funded out of public money, to give fair coverage and equitable access to opposition parties, help ensure appropriate media behavior during elections.
The media have traditionally been understood to refer to the printed press as well as radio and television broadcasters. In recent years however, the definition has become broader, encompassing new media including online journalism, and social media. Citizen journalism is widely gaining traction, including in countries where traditional media is either controlled or strictly regulated.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HOPE IT HELPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!