who lost the confidence in the democratic parliamentary system
Answers
Explanation:
>the provision of proportional representation meant that majority by a single party was impossible and coalition government was the norm. ->Article 48 gave the president the powers to impose emergency to suspend civil rights and to rule by decree. ... -> so people were losing ...
...
hope it helps you
Answer:
A motion of no confidence means that "a person(s) in a position of responsibility is no longer deemed fit to hold that position". In the current scenario, it would mean that that the parliament no longer has confidence in Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The Indian constitution does not mention no-confidence, however Article 75 specifies that the council of ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People. The implication of this Article is that the majority of Lok Sabha MPs must not be against the prime minister and his cabinet.
Additionally, Article 118 of the constitution permits both houses of Parliament to make its own rules for its functioning. Lok Sabha's Rule 198 mentions the procedure for a motion of no-confidence. So a no-confidence motion can only be passed in Lok Sabha as Rule 198 allows any member of the House to give a written notice.