Question

who rejects the frequent use of binary oppositions in structuralist criticism?

Answer 1

Post-structural criticism of binary oppositions is not simply the reversal of the opposition, but its deconstruction, which is described as apolitical—that is, not intrinsically favoring one arm of a binary opposition over the other. Deconstruction is the "event" or "moment" at which a binary opposition is thought to contradict itself, and undermine its own authority.

Answer 2

Deconstruction rejects the frequent use of binary oppositions in structuralist criticism

• Deconstruction rejects most of the premises of structuralism and more vehemently “binary opposition” on the surface that such oppositions always privilege one phrase over the other, that is, implied over the signifier.
• Deconstruction does not certainly mean "demolition;" rather it implies "breaking down" or analyzing something (particularly the words in a function of fiction or nonfiction) to find out its true importance, which is almost never precisely what the author aimed at.
• The impression of deconstruction is thus concerned with answering the idea of a metaphysical lineage or natural referent.
• It denies the idea that it is feasible to violate the organization in order to find out something beyond the presence of an independent origin.

#SPJ3