Who was Priscus? Do you think his description is reliable? Why?
Answers
Answer:
Priscus was a Roman ambassador to the Huns , I think that his description is reliable because he explains the severe troubles of Rome and his reason looks reasonable .
Answer:
Priscus was a Roman envoy to the Huns, and I believe his account to be accurate since he details Rome's serious problems and offers a plausible explanation.
The fifth king of Rome, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus (traditionally 616–579 BCE), was said to be the progeny of Demaratus of Corinth, who fled to Tarquinii to escape Cypselus' rule. Tarquin moved to Rome with his family, including his wife Tanaquil, and established himself as Ancus Marcius' right-hand man.
If the army hadn't disintegrated, the tribes wouldn't have been able to attack. Because the Romans would not have permitted the Huns to rule if they truly despised them, this text aids in the explanation of the fall of the Roman Empire.
Here are a few reasons why the Roman Empire collapsed:
- Rome's leaders and politicians become increasingly corrupt.
- Civil wars and internal strife inside the Empire.
- barbarian groups from outside the empire, such as the Visigoths, Huns, Franks, and Vandals, would attack.
The reasons of the fall of Rome-
- Barbarian tribe invasions.
- Economic difficulties and overuse of slave labour.
- Growing influence of the Eastern Empire.
- Growth and excessive military spending.
- Political instability and public corruption.
- The Huns' invasion and the exodus of the barbarian tribes.
Read here more-
Regarding the retraction of Rizal, Which among the accounts or analyses do you consider the most convincing and reliable? Why?
https://brainly.in/question/32573431
Write down the reason for the decline of Roman empire
https://brainly.in/question/5650554
#SPJ2