who was treated badly after first world war
Answers
Answer:
The British were very careful to cater for the different backgrounds of their Indian soldiers. It helped to encourage loyalty and gratitude if their cultural expectations were met and also served to keep distinctions between Indian soldiers clear, reducing the likelihood of conspiracies against British rule. Diet was a sensitive issue for Indian soldiers. Muslim soldiers for example were typically meat-eaters. They ate most animals such as beef, lamb, chicken or mutton, but not pork. For religious reasons, the animal had to be slaughtered in the correct fashion for it to be considered halal (permissible).
The British were very careful to cater for the different backgrounds of their Indian soldiers. It helped to encourage loyalty and gratitude if their cultural expectations were met and also served to keep distinctions between Indian soldiers clear, reducing the likelihood of conspiracies against British rule. Diet was a sensitive issue for Indian soldiers. Muslim soldiers for example were typically meat-eaters. They ate most animals such as beef, lamb, chicken or mutton, but not pork. For religious reasons, the animal had to be slaughtered in the correct fashion for it to be considered halal (permissible).As a result of their involvement in the fighting on the Western Front there was a need for thousands of wounded and sick Indian troops to be treated in Europe. Military hospitals were set up in Brighton (including in George IV`s Royal Pavilion) where careful provision were made to ensure that soldiers had little cause for offence.
Explanation:
Hope it helps mark me as brain list...❤✌
Answer:
the war treated the central powers _ mainly Germany, Austria Hungary , and Turkey _ against the allies - Mainly France , Great Britain , Russia, Italy ,Japan. and from 1917, the United States. it ended with defeat of the central powers.