who written the thought knowledge is important but common sense is more essential
Answers
Explanation:
Common sense is knowledge. It’s just a particular subset of knowledge . It’s knowledge arrived at by straightforward reasoning that should be available to almost everyone if they take the time to think it through.
So the question becomes, is knowledge that is acquired through common sense more important than knowledge acquired by other means?
The answer to that question is varied. It depends on the other means.
Knowledge lies in the intersection between Truth and Belief. You can believe things that aren’t true, in which case the knowledge you gain in that case is wrong or incomplete.
Reliable and complete knowledge requires a more reliable and complete understanding of the truth. We have ways of getting at the truth, but they are not all equal in their effectiveness. For example:
Ask someone you trust, but who isn’t informed or an expert in the field
Ask someone your trust. but who is inexperienced or a muddy thinker
Ask an expert you trust
Conduct your own sloppy inquiry
Conduct your own inquiry, using rigorous methods (like science)
Jump to a hasty conclusion
Think deeply about the matter, after gathering research and evidence or conducting experiments
Understand your own cognitive biases and ways to lessen them as you try to interpret the evidence
Answer:
Hope this will help you
Explanation:
Common sense is knowledge. It’s just a particular subset of knowledge . It’s knowledge arrived at by straightforward reasoning that should be available to almost everyone if they take the time to think it through.
So the question becomes, is knowledge that is acquired through common sense more important than knowledge acquired by other means?
The answer to that question is varied. It depends on the other means.
Knowledge lies in the intersection between Truth and Belief. You can believe things that aren’t true, in which case the knowledge you gain in that case is wrong or incomplete.
Reliable and complete knowledge requires a more reliable and complete understanding of the truth. We have ways of getting at the truth, but they are not all equal in their effectiveness. For example:
Ask someone you trust, but who isn’t informed or an expert in the field
Ask someone your trust. but who is inexperienced or a muddy thinker
Ask an expert you trust
Conduct your own sloppy inquiry
Conduct your own inquiry, using rigorous methods (like science)
Jump to a hasty conclusion
Think deeply about the matter, after gathering research and evidence or conducting experiments
Understand your own cognitive biases and ways to lessen them as you try to interpret the evidence
That’s just a small sample. Obviously some of these methods are far more reliable than others.
The common sense approach is lightweight and non-rigorous. That doesn’t make it useless. It’s fine for a superficial understanding and may be good enough for pragmatic use in many everyday situations.
But don’t expect to solely rely on it when the problem is complex, or the situation is nuanced, or lives are at stake. Then you need the big guns: Science, Logic, Expert opinion, Evidence, Analysis, etc.