History, asked by noah38, 1 year ago

why 2+1=3 not 4
$.$

Attachments:

prince2896: hii noah

agan4455454: hi baby

prince2896: hot girl noah

Answers

Answered by akshita94

2

Because this is a rule of maths.

agan4455454: good

Answered by genious2000

1

Not always
Sometimes 2 big things can be added to resultant four pieces, due to instability

genious2000: Mark it as brainliest

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Math, 6 months ago

Answer: \huge{ \underline{ \boxed{ \mathfrak{ \star{ \purple{ \pink{ \orange{ \green{ \orange{ \pink{ \mathtt{a}{} }{n} }{s} }{} }{} }{w} }{e} }{r} }{} }{} }{} }{} ⋆answer ...

Math, 6 months ago

how to delete any question or answer...

Math, 6 months ago

list the factors of 140, 168 and 210.

Physics, 1 year ago

what other details or information included in your intruction that is clearer and easier to follow...

Science, 1 year ago

Biogas plant use in marathi project...

Math, 1 year ago

14375 diveded 6 full calculation?

Science, 1 year ago

what is CLI? explain.

English, 1 year ago

50points for this!! Ans all 10 Who said the following wise words? 1."Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” 2.“So many books, so little time.” 3.“No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.” 4.“If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.” 5.“Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.”...