Question

why are chronicles written by court historians not considered to be reliable sources of history?​

Answer 1

Answer:

The historians do not rely extensively on court chronicles because these are often biased and prejudiced and thus misrepresent the facts. The court chroniclers used to exaggerate the things about the king and ignore his shortcomings. They used to write for rewards

Explanation:

please mark my ans as brainliest please

Answer 2

The historians do not rely extensively on court chronicles because these are often biased and prejudiced and thus misrepresent the facts. The court chroniclers used to exaggerate the things about the king and ignore his shortcomings. They used to write for rewards.

PLEASE MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST AND FOLLOW ME PLEASE