Why are generators defined oppositely in Weinberg's vs. Maggiore's QFT books?
Answers
Answered by
0
Hey mate ^_^
the parameters ωω are not the same in both cases: one is the negative of the other (actively rotating ππ radians is the same as passively rotating −π−π radians).....
Therefore, both U,JU,J are the same in both conventions, but one ωωis the opposite of the other.....
#Be Brainly❤️
the parameters ωω are not the same in both cases: one is the negative of the other (actively rotating ππ radians is the same as passively rotating −π−π radians).....
Therefore, both U,JU,J are the same in both conventions, but one ωωis the opposite of the other.....
#Be Brainly❤️
Answered by
2
Hello mate here is your answer.
the parameters ωω are not the same in both cases: one is the negative of the other (actively rotating ππradians is the same as passively rotating −π−πradians). Therefore, both U,JU,J are the same in both conventions, but one ωω is the opposite of the other.
Hope it helps you.
the parameters ωω are not the same in both cases: one is the negative of the other (actively rotating ππradians is the same as passively rotating −π−πradians). Therefore, both U,JU,J are the same in both conventions, but one ωω is the opposite of the other.
Hope it helps you.
Similar questions