Question

why brilliance cannot be considered as concrete noun describe.​

Answer 1

Answer:

It's an odd use of brilliance, in fact I would contend the meaning is that he added back a quality of the flame - not something concrete. I suppose given the nature of the narrative brilliance could be seen as a thing added to another other thing - a flame - but that would be an idiosyncratic use, literary license, not common usage.

Explanation:

PLEASE MARK ME AS THE BRAINLIEST I NEED ONLY ONE BRAINLIEST ANSWER