why cannot litigation is not accessible for small farmers
Answers
Answer:
It is not that contract farming is new to India or it did not have any legal backing. Under the Model APMC Act, 2003 also, contract farming was permitted and the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committees (APMCs) were given the responsibility to record the contracts. They were also mandated to resolve the disputes in such contracts. However, market fee and other levies/charges were payable to APMCs.
Currently, contract farming requires registration with the APMC in a few states. This means that contractual agreements are recorded with the APMCs, which can also resolve disputes arising out of these contracts. Furthermore, market fees and levies are paid to the APMC to undertake
please add my answer to the brainelist answers and follows up me.
Farmers and companies that support agribusiness face hardships each year. Whether it is a decrease in the price of crops, rising costs and crippling expenses, devastating weather, or tariffs that significantly affect exports, operating a farm is a delicate balance. It’s no secret to a North Carolina farmer though – it’s a way of life. Legal problems cannot only exacerbate the hardship, they can create economic disaster and even cause the loss of the farming operation. For example, recent nuisance litigation in North Carolina has resulted in multi-million dollar jury verdicts that threaten the entire hog industry - unpredictably defending its operation against neighbors which had a devastating impact on their business. What about the trade war dispute between the United States and China? Regardless which side of the political isle you are on, tariffs on crops grown in American hit the farmer first and hardest. As times change, so does the operation of a farm. Farmers today not only face the hardships of decades passed, but new, complicated issues have emerged, including complex legal matters and draconian regulations