Why desire is compared with fire and Hate is compared with ice??? ( FIRE AND ICE)
Answers
Hi mate
If it helps u mark me brainest
In his poem, Fire and Ice, Robert Frost considers the destruction of the world and compares two ways by which it could be accomplished, through fire or through ice. Desire and hate are believed to be the forces that may allow the worlds end, as they are contributing factors to war. Fire can be interpreted as a metaphor for war and desire, and Ice being a result of the war and linked with hate. War is thought of as being the power provoking the worlds destruction.
Desire can mean many things; it could be viewed positively in a sense of wishing for something and passion, or negatively, as the hunger for something can lead to greed. In this poem desire is directly related to greed. When discussing the destruction of the world, the meaning of desire could be interpreted only to a negative degree. History has proven that one of the determinants of a war is the desire for power and control. Many wars have been fought over the control of land and resources, while others were because of a desire to be the most powerful nation. The lines, From what Ive tasted of desire/ I hold with those who favor fire. (l. 3-4) refer to the idea that desire is connected with war. The persona uses past tense saying Ive tasted meaning he has experienced desire before. As Frost lived through both World Wars, he has witnessed first hand the link between desire and war, which leads to believe he may be the speaker in the poem. And as previously mentioned fire is a direct comparison to war; so when saying he agrees with the idea of fire being the means in which the world ends, Frost is saying that because of desire the world will end in war.
Hate is a powerful word, and is a force so strong it can overcome all other emotions, leading to many possible horrors. Hate has been the drive behind many of societys greatest tragedies
Answer:
‘Fire and Ice’ - Robert Frost
In the poem ‘Fire and Ice’ Robert Frost explains how the world will end by either fire or ice. The poet uses these two primal elements to serve as a metaphor for the destructive powers of the universal human emotions. ‘Desire’ which he associates with fire, and ‘hate’ which he associates with ice. The poet uses the first person singular and concludes that from personal experience he sides with the people who believe the world will end in fire. But, after analysing his experience with hate, he concludes that ice would be equally as destructive. Frost effectively communicates the central focus of the poem which is how desire and hate are…show more content…
This is quite a contrast as the poet is describing two unique emotions with such lack of emotional/descriptive words. The poet uses this technique to effectively convey how people undermine the destructive powers of the human emotion, people think that the world may end in a nuclear winter/ice age (ice) or global warming/incinerate (fire) but ignore the realities of how excessive desire and hate can ultimately lead to destruction. The straight forward tone is demonstrated in the first line where the poet uses the word ‘some’ to explain the different views on the demise of the world. ‘Some’ is a very vague and generalised word and Frost also uses this to portray the lack of knowledge people have about the true powers of the human emotions. In addition, the poet uses the word ‘suffice’ to end in the poem in an ambiguous and powerful way. This particular word indicates the narrator’s opinion that the word ending in ice would also be enough. The fact that this word is very casual and generalised not only demonstrates how both emotions are equally as destructive as one another, but also how the end of the world will always be a mystery. No one will ever know because maybe it is that people do not realise enough the murderous consequences of human emotions. Furthermore, Frost is very clever in that he uses powerful descriptions of the elements ‘fire’ and ‘ice’ to help emphasise the destructive traits of desire
Explanation: